Your legacy systems get analyzed, documented, and modernized with AI-assisted methods — while operations of the old systems continue uninterrupted during migration. One partner, one plan, no double team. AI Operating System path when legacy systems block AI adoption.
A modernized stack is the artefact. A live workflow on top of it is the proof.
Event-sourced, model-agnostic, EU-resident. Replayable. Instrumented for AI consumption.
The 6-component model rebuilt into operating primitives. Composable. Audit-traced.
DSGVO + sectoral. DPIA, model registry, rollback ≤24h, supervisory-ready.
Production by month 06, on the new stack — same delivery commitment as the Accelerator.
Your ops team's pane of glass. Shadow-mode, switch, rollback — without engineering.
The 60–80% defensible. CFO sign-off. Tied to instrumentation in the new stack.
No 9-month replatform that lands in one cutover. Each slice runs in shadow against the old stack first.
Workflow + stack audit. Methodology applied. Slice plan locked.
Data + workflow planes for one workflow. Shadow mode against legacy.
Switch traffic. Legacy retires. Cost-out starts compounding.
Slices 02–04 land on the same plane. Each is faster + cheaper than the last.
Most Modernization engagements surface during Plan 2 or Plan 3 of the unified path — when legacy systems block AI adoption. It runs in parallel with the build, or as a follow-on after the OS is live.
● Not sure which plan you're on? Take the 10-min Diagnostic → ● Already on the path? See the AI Operating System page →
Most engagements start with the Audit — a clear recommendation, migration plan, and cost frame in 2–3 weeks. Stabilization keeps the legacy running while the AI-native rebuild begins.
Replatforms fail because they ship at the end. This ships every slice.
Every slice runs in shadow against the legacy system before traffic switches. Cutovers are anti-climactic on purpose.
The data + workflow planes are written so swapping models or providers is a config change, not a project.
BaFin, FINMA, sectoral regulators — your filing pack is a deliverable, not an afterthought. Supervisory language built in.
If after M06 you don't want slices 02–04, you walk with a working stack and a live workflow. No vendor handcuffs.
No 9-month replatform. The slice plan means your production cutover happens in month 06 — on a narrow workflow — and the rest compounds on a stack that's already live.
Then they should. Our pod can run alongside as senior reviewers and pair-ship instead of leading. Pricing flexes downward; KPIs and guarantees don't.
No. Proven across AWS, Azure, GCP, Hetzner, OVH, on-prem, and air-gapped environments. The data + workflow planes are built so provider swaps are a configuration change, not a project.
Yes — that's a common pattern. Several engagements have replaced 7-figure annual SaaS / managed-service contracts with the new stack. The cost-out memo accounts for it.
The governance plane is the deliverable here. You get a bundled DPIA, model registry, audit log spec, pen-test scope, and supervisory filing kit. Your auditors get a single binder.
If you're already in Plan 2 or Plan 3, the Audit slot is reserved. If you're approaching Modernization standalone, the Diagnostic tells you whether it's the right next move.